I wrote this on a blog in response to a conservative woman planning to vote for Romney, despite her arguing that the candidates are equally poor. I like it enough to reproduce it here.
You ignore Romney's appalling lack of integrity to set up your
equivalence between the two candidates. He is sexist, racist, and
homophobic—again, why any woman would support someone so sexist, I do
not understand. Romney has a record as a businessman and a politician.
He has repudiated all of it to win the Presidency and then repudiated
his repudiations. He has changed his positions not just once, but
multiple times. The only policy goals he has reliably supported are
lower taxes for himself and his class, and less regulation on his
business activities, and those of his class.
I see no indication
of political courage in the man, and if he has any honor, it is reserved
for his small group of peers. As someone from a military family, why
would you want to see someone with so little honor and integrity as
commander in chief?
Turning to Obama, I am struck by how little
he has lied. He has dissembled, he has misdirected, he has
stonewalled—he is after all a politician. But he seldom has lied
outright. I am not sure he ever has, except in the slanders of
conservative commentators. I am surprised how little of their own
ideals conservatives see in Obama. Distressingly, it appears to me that
his egalitarianism and his skin color trump his conservative virtues in
Later thought: this is actually very interesting. Obama is honest. How unusual is that?
This is, more than anything else, an election
about identity. Romney is the candidate of Wall Street and the rich
old white guys; Obama is Wall Street's less favored son and the
candidate of everyone else.
Turning to policy issues…
To begin with there is no left of any power in the USA.
The Democrats are a conservative party with a weak liberal wing; the
Republicans have come to be dominated by the radical right. This is not
hard to see. The Tea Party Republicans are routinely on television.
Their ideas have been aired repeatedly and some of them have even found
their way into the Republican platform. The Democrats treat Occupy, the
only publicly visible left, like it has leprosy. Their ideas have seldom
if ever, gotten air time on a major network. Grover Norquist controls
the votes of most Congressional Republicans on taxes. See any radical
leftist policy advocates with similar power? Seen Congresspeople quake
in their boots when they speak?
Second, why do
you credit conservative economic analysis? It has had a 30 year run
that has impoverished much of the country and ended in a depression.The
same economists who are predicting the doom you describe are the ones
who have been—for four years now!—predicting an explosive rise in
interest rates and hyper-inflation. You see those high interest rates
have revealed themselves as unscientific political hacks, and it is time
to start treating them like flat-earthers.
A sub-point here: If
Obamacare is going to be as destructive as you claim—why do you trust
Romney to make health care policy? Romney was for Obamacare—invented
it—before he was against it.
Third, why is a World War II level
of military readiness necessary to the USA? Is there an enemy comparable
to Nazi Germany or Imperial Japan? We are ready to fight World War II
again, yet future global conflict will not be World War II again.
frequently remarked that we do not know with what weapons World War III
will be fought, but that World War IV will be fought with rocks. For
some centuries wars have been increasing in intensity. We are now at a
level of military technology and organization where a global conflict
will destroy civilization, and perhaps even the future chances of a
revived civilization. The national security of the United States depends on a reduction in global tensions. You see any conservative advocates of global peace and justice?
Actually, there are a few. The economist Jeffrey Sachs comes to mind. And of course there is (redacted) , in this discussion.
I seriously Do Not Get conservatives.
am writing, I suppose, to underscore some of the contradictions I see. I
have little hope of changing anyone's mind at this time, but I hope I
will influence thinking in the future. Right now, like the crying girl
in the YouTube video, I just want to get through this election.