I
wrote this about possible Republican opposition to Bernie Sanders two years ago:
The Republicans would have dug up his 1972 alternative press essay on
sexuality and gender roles and spun it as rapey. They'd have dragged out
his support for the Sandinistas in Nicaragua and said he was a
Communist and a traitor. They'd have dog-whistled the white
supremacists, painting Sanders as a race traitor, and spun up the
anti-semitism, all the while claiming he was a bad Jew and a traitor to
Israel. They'd have told the African-Americans he was racist, and told
the white folk he was too soft on African-American criminals. They'd
have leaned on his atheism.
Consider this on Corbyn's defeat, just now written:
They said he was a
Communist and a traitor. They dog-whistled the white
supremacists, painting him as a race traitor, and spun up the
antisemitism, all the while claiming he was a bad Jew and a traitor to
Israel. They told the Muslims he was Islamophobic, and told
the non-Muslims he was soft on terrorism. They leaned on his atheism.
We need to think carefully about our response to bullying and character assassination. Sanders, I think, is exceptionally vulnerable to these attacks, but none of the non-fascist US Presidential candidates are immune.
No comments:
Post a Comment