(In answer to one of these annoying forwards.)
Historically, the economy does
better under Democratic Presidents than Republicans. Think about it.
There was Hoover, who presided over the beginning of the 1930s depression, and then the two great borrow-and-spenders
Reagan and Bush II. Bush II presided over the beginning of what is
turning out to be the worst depression in US history. On the other hand,
FDR presided over a decent recovery, and Truman, JFK, LBJ, and Clinton
presided over prosperous times. Obama, embarrassingly, makes economic
policy like a Republican, and we are now in a depression likely to dwarf
that of the 1930s.
Democratic economic policies work better than Republican economic policies. I believe this is because they are closer to Keynesian macroeconomic reality.
(Reference, though not scholarly: Bulls, Bears, and the Ballot Box.)
Democratic economic policies work better than Republican economic policies. I believe this is because they are closer to Keynesian macroeconomic reality.
(Reference, though not scholarly: Bulls, Bears, and the Ballot Box.)
No comments:
Post a Comment