A few days ago, I snarkily tweeted,
“Give the southern states to African-Americans as part of reparations.” I was
not proposing a separate African-American republic, but Doug1943 took
my remark that way and commented that this was a 1930s Comintern position. I
did not know that, but it turns out to be true. An extended history of the
matter, “The
Communist Party and Black Liberation in the 1930s” with a map, even, was
published in the now-defunct International Socialist Review in 1997. (That
archive may not last. If you care about such things, download a copy.) The idea
of a black country, which turns out to be called black separatism, was not only
a Communist one. It has a long history and survives to this day as part of the
ideology of the Nation of Islam. The broader idea of black nationalism – that
African-Americans ought to see themselves as one people, and organize to
support each other – has a history that goes to the founding of the USA and, in
some sense, is part of the thinking of most African-Americans.
Doug goes on to object to what he
calls “identity politics,” complains it is a destructive project, and goes on
to complain that the left is using it to attack patriotism. To which I say that
most powerful identity politics in the USA has always been white identity
politics, that it has been present in the USA from the very beginning, and that
what the left can do and say has been nowhere near as destructive of US patriotism
than white supremacism and the treason of the Republican Presidents Nixon,
Reagan, and Trump, all strongly supported by their party.
So, back to the South.
My original remark was sarcasm,
but I would like to take it seriously, at least for the purposes of this post. Ta-Nehisi
Coates, the current leading advocate of reparations (his 2014 article in The
Atlantic, “The
Case for Reparations,” is important, and you should read it) argues for
financial compensation for acts against African-Americans. There are fortunes
and estates in the South surviving from the times of slavery. These could be
confiscated and offered to African-Americans. It would be difficult. There
would be enormous practical problems with doing so – who gets this property,
who administers this property? Coates addresses some of these in a subsequent
article, “The
Radical Practicality of Reparations” but it would not be an easy project.
The project also raises broader
questions. If African-Americans are owed reparations, what about Native
Americans? What reparation even is possible to Natives? So much of history is
expropriation of one people’s land by another people. So many peoples have claims
and counterclaims. Still, studying the question and proposing solutions would
be worthwhile. If the whole of the injustice cannot be remedied, which I think
is probably the case, what remedies are possible?
holy crap..I can hear General Lee flopping over in his grave..
ReplyDeleteLOL.
ReplyDeleteAlternative energy source?
But enough is enough. We have to end racism in the USA. I want never again to see the likes of what is being done on the southern border. I want never again to hear of a black person shot by police for no reason other than the color of their skin.
While you solve that problem, tackle the Israelis vs the Palestinians who both claim the same land. You could do better than Trump.
ReplyDeleteLOLsob
ReplyDeleteThe chief obstacle to an African-American homeland in the South, is the whites who currently live there. They would need to be displaced. If they didn't go voluntarily, they would have to 'persuaded', through terror. This is the usual way the human race re-organizes itself when its tribes have gotten too interpenetrated.
ReplyDeleteThe most recent spectacular example of this was the former Yugoslavia. Burma today gives us another model. The division of Cyprus, another. Whoever invented the slogan "Diversity is Strength" had probably just finished reading 1984.
With enough killing, the whites can be persuaded to go. Simple killing is not enough... prolonged excruciating torture and mutilation before death will have a much stronger effect -- South Africa today provides some examples. Children should not, of course, be exempt.
But ... it will be much easier to drive the whites out, if the survivors have someplace to go. I strongly suggest the Northwest states, as a kind of 'Red America', which can then be expelled from the union.
I am haunted by philosopher Gregory Bateson's remark: "Your survival unit will be your and your folks or conspecifics against the environment of other social units, other races, and the brutes and vegetables. If this is your estimate of your relation to nature and you have an advanced technology, your likelihood of survival will be that of a snowball in hell."
ReplyDelete